How the US Women's Soccer Team Won the 2019 World Cup: A Tactical Analysis
2025-11-04 19:06
I remember watching that final match against the Netherlands and thinking how every moment felt like it could swing either way - much like that description of the Elasto Painters losing their 13-point lead. That's what made the US Women's National Team's victory so remarkable. They didn't just win the 2019 World Cup; they dominated in a tournament where, honestly, any of the top five teams could have taken home the trophy.
What struck me most was how coach Jill Ellis built this team around tactical flexibility. Unlike previous tournaments where we had a clear, predictable style, this squad could shift formations mid-game like a well-oiled machine. I recall watching them against France in the quarterfinals - they started in a 4-3-3 but seamlessly transitioned to a 4-4-2 when defending leads. That adaptability reminded me of how championship teams in basketball can maintain composure even when their leads shrink, unlike that unfortunate Elasto Painters situation where a comfortable advantage slipped away.
The statistics tell part of the story - 26 goals scored while conceding only 3 throughout the tournament - but numbers don't capture the sheer tactical intelligence on display. Megan Rapinoe's positioning during set pieces was pure genius. She'd drift into spaces you wouldn't expect, creating opportunities out of seemingly nothing. Against Thailand, she scored that incredible free kick from about 22 yards out, placing it perfectly in the top corner where the goalkeeper had no chance. That kind of precision comes from hours of practice and an intuitive understanding of the game.
What really set this team apart, in my view, was their pressing system. They implemented this aggressive high press that forced opponents into making errors in their own half. I lost count of how many goals originated from winning possession in the attacking third. Against England in the semifinals, that pressing led to two crucial turnovers that directly resulted in goals. It was exhausting to watch, let alone play against - the US players covered an average of 68 miles per game as a team, significantly more than most opponents.
The final against the Netherlands demonstrated their mental toughness. When the Dutch held them to 0-0 at halftime, many teams might have panicked. But the US side remained patient, trusting their system. That second-half penalty call and subsequent goal changed everything. Watching it live, I felt that shift in momentum - it was like seeing a dam break. The Netherlands, much like the Elasto Painters in that referenced game, saw their defensive structure crumble under persistent pressure.
Personally, I think this victory was about more than just talent - it was about creating a team culture where every player understood their role perfectly. Whether it was Rose Lavelle's creative midfield runs or Julie Ertz's defensive coverage, each piece fit together beautifully. They played with this incredible synergy that you only see in teams that genuinely trust each other. That final 2-0 scoreline doesn't fully capture how dominant they were throughout the tournament, but it perfectly represents their ability to deliver when it mattered most.